links

All the Mac news you could ever want is linked from Apple Enthusiast, according to TidBITS Tech News: Apple Enthusiast Offers New Take on News Aggregation:

Apple Enthusiast scours the RSS feeds of numerous Macintosh publications and sites, including TidBITS, to present headlines and links to original articles. What sets Apple Enthusiast apart from other aggregation sites is that it performs content analysis on articles and sorts them into categories, separating out Mac news from iPhone news, and homing in on product reviews, tips and tricks, developer news, iPhone and iPod touch software, games, Steve Jobs, and much more.

The irony? They don’t appear to provide RSS feeds …

Popularity: 16% [?]

I’m preparing a talk I’ll be giving next month, and found a small image I think will be appropriate as part of my presentation to community groups. I copied the image and its URL to my collections folder and then checked copyright on the site. Here’s part of what it says — The Ulster Museum - Copyright: [oh, ooops, that link shouldn't be there. I'm in trouble now]

… No part of these websites may be permanently copied or reproduced in any form or reproduced on any other website or stored in or transmitted to or from any other electronic or digital form in whole or in part …

Oh, darn, there I go again, using part of their website without permission! Here’s the really crazy part though:

… nor may links to our website be included in any other website without our written prior permission.

But wait, it gets better! I’m not allowed to link to them, but they, on the other hand …

Disclaimer for Links

Links within the The National Museums Northern Ireland websites may lead to other websites. …

Copyright I can understand. Heck, I create stuff all the time: tutorials, articles, blog posts and whatnot, and occasionally someone even pays me for some of it. I don’t really want others profiting from my labour, if I don’t.

But the attitude of this museum is just nuts. For starters, why on earth should people not link to them? Don’t they want anyone to know about them?

I’m not allowed to quote them? Again, don’t they want anyone to spread the word, to tell others about them? If they’re so secret, why do they have a web site? But they reserve the right to link to other sites themselves. Ridiculous.

On the other hand, it seems they do want to spread awareness:

By donating to the Ulster Museum, you will be helping to promote the awareness, appreciation and understanding of the history and heritage of the north of Ireland.

So, here’s what they should do: put as much of their web content as possible under a Creative Commons licence. Make it possible, and even encourage people to use parts of their content for non-commercial purposes, with attribution and a link back to them.

If they have products for sale, then make low resolution smallish sized images (suitable for the web and email) readily available and sell the higher quality, larger images suitable for print.

And links are a good thing, unless you’re trying to hide.

Popularity: 16% [?]

Yesterday a new client approached me about problems with his WordPress blog. He wasn’t particularly explicit:

My Wordpress site is starting to do strange things, Pages dropping off. Can’t post etc.

So off I went to have a look. The biggest problem was a sudden inability to post new items or to edit existing Posts or Pages. I could open an existing post, make changes and click Save, Save and Continue Editing or Publish — each with the same result: a completely and utterly blank Admin page, and a failure to have actually changed anything.

The hidden porn

My next step of course was intensive and extensive troubleshooting and investigation. I did a hundred things, including much Googling and searching WordPress forums, but one of the first things I did was to View Source on my client’s blog Home Page.

There I discovered two particularly interesting things:

1. A link to ‘prepaid phone cards’ above the content. This isn’t the kind of link my client would include. Suspicious.
2. Approximately 170 hidden links to porn sites. This is definitely not content my client would deliberately include in his blog. About 120 links went to one domain, the rest to another.

Had the blog been hacked?

It was looking as though my client’s blog had been hacked. But first, a bit more about those hidden links.

For starters they were hidden: visitors to the page couldn’t see them, but View Source made them all visible, and they were evident in the RSS feed.

At first I thought they were some kind of comment or trackback, but I eventually found them attached in the body of the most recently published post. They were prefaced with this interesting HTML that effectively hid them from view:

<font style="position: absolute; overflow-x: hidden; overflow-y: hidden; height: 0px; width: 0px"><!--4848-->

Somehow a spammer had accessed my client’s blog and added these links to one post. And maybe a spammer had added the cellphone spammy link to his theme. I downloaded a fresh copy of the theme he was using and checked. That spammy link was not in the original theme. The spam link was also hidden via embedded CSS:

<div style="display: none" id="ads">

The Visual Editor hides all

My client has the Visual Rich Editor turned on, and probably uses the Visual view to write posts. Guess what! Those porn links are invisible in that view. He wouldn’t have known they were there! I knew, because I clicked on the Code tab, as I always do. In Code view they were immediately obvious.

I deleted the porn, clicked Save, and struck the bug my client had originally complained of: an inability to edit posts. It wasn’t going to be that easy to get rid of the porn. So next I had to solve his Save problem.

But that took me the next day, so I’ll write about it in another post.

And finally, here’s what Daniel Jalkut, the developer of my favourite, MarsEdit says about WYSIWYG (what you get with the Visual Editor):

There are a list of classic things that are wrong with WYSIWYG editors. They over-promise and under-deliver. They’re not actually that easy to use. They mess up your HTML, and often outright eliminate content. I don’t want to make any of those mistakes. That’s what makes the feature hard, and that’s the reason users haven’t seen it yet in MarsEdit.

[Via : The Daniel Jalkut Interview.]

The moral of this story: even if you like the Visual editor, at least look at the Code view — you may be surprised at what you find.

Popularity: 20% [?]